MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7123605508 · doi:10.1145/3769126.3785016

An Overview of the COLIEE 2025 Competition: Legal Case Law and Statute Law Information Retrieval and Entailment

2025· article· W7123605508 on OpenAlexafffund
Randy Goebel, Yoshinobu Kano, Mi-Young Kim, Calum Kwan, KEN SATOH, Hiroaki Yamada, M. Yoshioka

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Law
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStatuteTortCommon lawTask (project management)Component (thermodynamics)Logical consequenceDamages

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We summarize the 12th Competition on Legal Information Extraction and Entailment. In this edition, the competition included four tasks on case law and statute law, plus a new pilot task on Tort law. The case law component includes an information retrieval task (Task 1), and the confirmation of an entailment relation between an existing case and an unseen case (Task 2). The statute law component includes an information retrieval task (Task 3), and an entailment/question-answering task based on retrieved civil code statutes (Task 4). The new pilot task is tort prediction (TP) and its rationale extraction (RE).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0160.018
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0210.018
Open science0.0090.012
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArtificial Intelligence in LawFrench-language works237,207