Bibliographic record
Abstract
Imaginée en pleine pandémie de COVID-19, alors que les portes des théâtres étaient closes, la déambulation chorégraphique In the Garden (2023) est née d’une promenade au jardin des plantes de Montpellier. Après une première résidence in situ informée par la rencontre avec les jardiniers prenant soin de celui-ci, cette oeuvre participative qui invite les publics à renouer avec l’expérience du sensible a évolué en fonction des différents jardins botaniques où elle a été programmée. Chaque nouvelle édition a été l’occasion d’une immersion dans ces écosystèmes particuliers, véritables poumons urbains, comme d’une réflexion sur le passé controversé et le devenir climatique de ces conservatoires de la biodiversité. Et, parmi d’autres gestes d’approche, c’est l’écoute profonde qui a été privilégiée pour se relier à ces milieux interspécifiques, où tout le vivant respire et conspire ensemble.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".