La performance en droit constitutionnel : le cas des États d’Afrique noire francophone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la nomenclature des nouveaux objets du droit constitutionnel figure en bonne place la question de la performance. Cette évolution est consécutive au fait que ledit droit ne se contente plus d’encadrer le pouvoir et d’énoncer les droits et libertés. Il s’intéresse désormais à la bonne gouvernance et aux résultats de l’action publique. Seulement, l’exaltation de la performance ne s’opère pas avec la même ampleur dans tous les espaces. Dans le nouveau constitutionnalisme des États d’Afrique noire francophone, c’est de manière timide que celle-ci est prise en compte, ce qui constitue un paradoxe au regard de la crise de gouvernance ambiante sur l’ensemble du continent africain. À l’analyse des lois fondamentales et de la dynamique constitutionnelle, il se dégage le double constat de l’aménagement lacunaire et de l’évaluation déficitaire de la performance dans les États à l’étude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".