MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124165190 · doi:10.5937/tehnika2506573b

YAG:Ce phosphor for converting blue light into yellow light with an increased red component

2025· article· sr· W7124165190 on OpenAlexaff
Bučevac Dušan M., O. Pimenova O., Krstić Vladimir D.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languagesr
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphorBlue lightRed lightAbsorption (acoustics)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Absorption bandPigmentVisible spectrum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, a YAG:Ce³⁺ phosphor for the conversion of blue light into yellow light with an increased red component was synthesized. The red component was enhanced by adding Cr-doped Al₂O₃ with strong red emission, synthesized by the glycine-nitrate method, to a commercial YAG:Ce phosphor powder. It was found that the optimal Cr concentration in Al₂O₃ was 0.3 mol%. After sintering at 1600 °C, dense YAG:Ce samples containing Cr-doped Al₂O₃ in amounts ranging from 1 to 10 wt% were obtained. Microstructural analysis revealed that Cr-doped Al₂O₃ grains were distributed within the YAG:Ce matrix. It was demonstrated that this composite phosphor converts blue light into yellow light with an enhanced red component. The highest red contribution was measured in YAG:Ce samples containing 5 wt% Cr-doped Al₂O₃. The increase in the red component was accompanied by a decrease in the intensity of the yellow emission due to electron transfer from CE to Cr as well as absorption of blue light by the Cr-doped Al₂O₃.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207