MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124229437

L’efecte modernitzador de l’estada a Nord-amèrica en l’emigració valenciana

2025· article· ca· W7124229437 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Juli Esteve Carbonell

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish History and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Public housingPoison control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El 1906 arriba a Montreal la primera expedició de jornalers valencians a Nord-Amèrica, 10 homes d’Orba que viatjaren farts del caciquisme imperant a la Marina i els voltants i de la misèria i els abusos generalitzats que produïa el sistema, i desfaenats alhora per l’avanç de la fil·loxera, que matava tota la vinya. L’enorme esclat migratori així provocat s’emportà moltíssimes persones a les destinacions tradicionals (Algèria, Cuba, l’Argentina...) i ara tam-bé a Nord-amèrica. Darrere dels Deu d’Orba, una investigació pròpia xifrà en 15.768 els emigrants valencians arribats al Canadà i els EUA fins el 1920, quan Washington tancà la frontera per als pobles mediterranis. L’èxit sobtat de l’opció nord-americana vingué d’unes diferències salarials impensables. Als que més temps treballaren i visqueren a Nova York o Connecticut, els capgirà la percepció del món, la mentalitat i la vida sencera. En tornar, eren persones diferents, més obertes i més lliures i sense els prejudicis i les pors ancestrals. Foren alcaldes de la República als seus pobles i esdevingueren models de modernitat. I educaren els fills i les filles d’una manera més igualitària, espentant-los a estudiar carreres per a ser persones de profit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Same topicSpanish History and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207