MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124234065

Koneoppimiseen perustuvien virtuaalisten sensorien soveltaminen sellun jauhatusprosessiin

2021· other· en· W7124234065 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Miika Karsimus

Bibliographic record

VenueAaltodoc (Aalto University) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoft sensorPattern recognition (psychology)Convolutional neural networkArtificial neural networkConsistency (knowledge bases)Refining (metallurgy)Feature extractionNoise reduction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Refining is one of the most important steps in pulp manufacturing, aiming to improve the strength properties of the final product (board) by mechanically treating cellulose fibers using refining blades. The degree of refining is typically measured by Canadian Standard Freeness (CSF). However, since CSF is difficult to measure online, an inferential model for providing real-time information on CSF is desired. Due to the complexity and nonlinearity of the pulp refining process, and the availability of historical data, a machine learning based soft sensor is an attractive approach to model the process and predict pulp or board properties. In this thesis, a two-staged dynamic convolutional neural network (CNN) based soft sensor framework is developed for predicting the CSF after a low consistency refining phase in a semi-chemical (NSSC) pulping process. In the first stage, an unsupervised denoising CNN-autoencoder (CNN-DAE) is applied for learning a hidden feature representation of the input data. Moreover, the DAE serves as a robust anomaly detector for noisy data, simultaneously allowing to pretrain the model both with labeled and unlabeled (no CSF observation) samples. In the second stage, a supervised CNN with pretrained weights is trained to predict the CSF. In addition, a similar soft sensor for predicting pulp consistency is developed without the pretraining phase. The CNN-DAE soft sensor outperformed the benchmark models (incl. partial least-squares regression; PLS) in the freeness prediction, achieving satisfactory prediction accuracy using 15 carefully selected input variables, such as refining power, consistency, flow, etc. Lagged observations of the variables were included to the input samples to capture the dynamics of the process. Slightly better scores were obtained using all input variables (94), which demonstrates the superior ability of the CNN to automatically learn relevant features. The CNN soft sensor achieved good predictive performance in the consistency prediction, the results being comparable to the PLS. Furthermore, the CNN-DAE showed great potential in unsupervised anomaly detection, being able to detect abnormal process events and consistency sensor drift from the data. Overall, the results indicate that data-driven predictive models seem promising for the pulp and board industry when integrated with extensive process knowledge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAaltodoc (Aalto University)French-language works237,207