MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124246323 · doi:10.29313/jrpwk.v5i2.7860

Perencanaan Sebaran Lokasi Ruang Terbuka Hijau Publik Kelurahan Sukarame

2025· article· W7124246323 on OpenAlexaff
Axcel Panalementa, Baiq Rindang Aprildahani

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Riset Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicWetland Management and Conservation
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDominance (genetics)Land useLand-use planningLand coverSustainabilityUrban planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The availability of public green open space (RTHP) plays a vital role in maintaining environmental quality and promoting social well-being in urban areas. However, in Sukarame Subdistrict, Bandar Lampung City, the current provision of RTHP accounts for only 0.19% of the total area, which falls significantly below the national standard of 20%. This article aims to analyze the need for RTHP based on land area and population, and to identify potential locations for future development. The study applies a quantitative-spatial approach utilizing secondary data analysis, satellite image interpretation, and GIS-based spatial mapping through Google Earth and ArcGIS. Key aspects analyzed include existing land use, land ownership status from the BhumiATR platform, and physical land conditions. The results indicate that the ideal requirement of RTHP ranges from 44.9 to 53.2 hectares, while the identified potential land area only reaches 1.07 hectares across nine sites. The dominance of privately owned land presents challenges in the allocation of new RTHP areas. Therefore, the study recommends an integrated land acquisition strategy prioritizing government-owned land and promoting collaborative, adaptive planning to support sustainable urban environments. Abstrak. Ketersediaan ruang terbuka hijau publik (RTHP) memiliki peran yang penting dalam menjaga kualitas lingkungan dan kehidupan sosial masyarakat perkotaan. Namun, di Kelurahan Sukarame, Kota Bandar Lampung, luasan RTHP yang tersedia hanya mencapai 0,19% dari total wilayah, jauh di bawah standar nasional sebesar 20%. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebutuhan RTHP berdasarkan luas wilayah dan jumlah penduduk, serta mengidentifikasi lokasi potensial penyediaan RTHP yang layak dikembangkan. Pendekatan analisis yang digunakan mencakup pengolahan data sekunder, interpretasi citra satelit, serta pemetaan spasial berbasis perangkat lunak Google Earth dan ArcGIS. Aspek-aspek yang dianalisis meliputi penggunaan lahan eksisting, status kepemilikan lahan dari platform Bhumi ATR, serta kondisi fisik lahan. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa kebutuhan ideal RTHP di Kelurahan Sukarame mencapai 44,9–53,2 hektar, sementara lahan potensial yang berhasil diidentifikasi hanya seluas 1,07 hektar yang tersebar di sembilan lokasi. Dominasi kepemilikan hak milik pribadi menjadi tantangan dalam perencanaan pengadaan lahan RTHP. Oleh karena itu, disarankan adanya integrasi kebijakan pengadaan lahan RTHP dengan prioritas pada lahan milik pemerintah dan pendekatan perencanaan yang kolaboratif dan adaptif dalam rangka mendukung keberlanjutan lingkungan dan sosial perkotaan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Riset Perencanaan Wilayah dan KotaSame topicWetland Management and ConservationFrench-language works237,207