MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124258061 · doi:10.36167/cos09/casellepdf

L'Ufficio del capitolo del monastero di Santa Maria di Pontetetto: il codice BCF 93

2025· article· it· W7124258061 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lucia Caselle

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVernacularObituarySection (typography)Quarter (Canadian coin)Normative

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Codex Lucca, Biblioteca Capitolare Feliniana 93 is a composite manuscript consisting of three sections that serves as the Liber Capituli of the Benedictine female monastery of Pontetetto near Lucca. The first section contains a normative text of twenty-six chapters in vernacular, the second includes the Regula Benedicti accompanied by its vernacular translation and the third consists of a homiliary and an obituary calendar, both in Latin. The first two sections can be dated to the last quarter of the 13th century, while the third dates back to the 12th century. The aim of the present contribution is the analysis of the codex in all its parts. Particular attention is paid to the relationship between the codex and the monastery, the linguistic aspects of the vernacular translation of the Regula, which exhibits features traceable to different geographical areas of the Italian peninsula, the relationship between this text and its Latin source and the characteristics of the obituary contained in the third section

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicMedieval European Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207