“Il est donné, dans toutes les langues, de bâtir la tour”. Glissant all’ascolto delle voci del mondo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partendo dall’interesse di Glissant per la salvaguardia della molteplicità linguistica, di cui testimoniano in particolare le interviste concesse nel corso degli anni a Lise Gauvin, il saggio si sofferma sull’ultima produzione dello scrittore alla ricerca delle voci della terra e del mondo, come indicano il sottotitolo, “Poésie en étendue”, del suo ultimo, importante, lavoro teorico, Philosophie de la Relation (2009), e l’antologia La Terre, le feu, l’eau et les vents. Une anthologie de la poésie du Tout-monde (2010). Due lavori che, pur nella loro straordinaria diversità, mostrano come Glissant, più noto per la sua opera saggistica e narrativa che per la sua poesia, abbia in realtà sempre privilegiato quel linguaggio poetico che meglio di altri permette agli uomini di comunicare tra loro, quale che sia la lingua in cui scrivono la loro opera.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".