MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124266044 · doi:10.1016/j.magmed.2026.100053

A unified control framework for magnetic manipulation: Integrating a robotic arm and an electromagnetic system with simulation verification

2025· article· en· W7124266044 on OpenAlexaff
Tongxin Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotic armWorkspaceTracking (education)TrajectoryMotion controlMagnetic fieldControl systemPoint (geometry)Robot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the challenge of achieving dexterous non-contact manipulation by proposing a novel unified control framework that seamlessly integrates the macro-scale motion of a robotic arm with the micro-scale force field generated by an electromagnetic system. Traditional magnetic manipulation systems are often constrained to pre-defined workspaces or lack the dexterity for complex tasks. Our approach leverages the extensive reach of a 6-DOF robotic arm to position an electromagnetic effector, which then generates highly localized magnetic fields for precise manipulation of magnetic objects. The core contribution is a hierarchical control algorithm that computes the required joint trajectories for the robotic arm and the necessary current inputs for the electromagnetic coils based on the desired trajectory of the manipulated object. This algorithm solves the inverse problem of magnetic force modeling in real-time. To validate our framework, we developed a high-fidelity simulation environment that models the robotic arm dynamics, the magnetic field, and the object’s motion. Extensive simulation results demonstrate the framework’s effectiveness in performing complex tasks such as non-contact planar tracing and 3D steering of a magnetic particle with an average tracking accuracy of 15 μ m. Our work provides a foundational control strategy for applications in non-contact automation, microrobotics, and biomedicine, paving the way for future experimental implementation. The graphical abstract depicts the core concept of the integrated magnetic manipulation system. It illustrates the robotic arm positioning a multi-coil electromagnetic end-effector at the tool center point (TCP), generating a localized magnetic field to exert forces on a magnetic particle. A world-fixed camera provides real-time feedback on the particle’s position (pp), enabling closed-loop control for precise non-contact manipulation. This schematic highlights the hierarchical coordination between macro-motion (robotic arm) and micro-force (electromagnetic coils), essential for applications like in-vitro biomedical tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic MedicineSame topicMicro and Nano RoboticsFrench-language works237,207