MaDi: Learning to Mask Distractions for Generalization in Visual Deep Reinforcement Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The visual world provides an abundance of information, but many input pixels received by agents often contain distracting stimuli. Autonomous agents need the ability to distinguish useful information from task-irrelevant perceptions, enabling them to generalize to unseen environments with new distractions. Existing works approach this problem using data augmentation or large auxiliary networks with additional loss functions. We introduce MaDi, a novel algorithm that learns to mask distractions by the reward signal only. In MaDi, the conventional actor-critic structure of deep reinforcement learning agents is complemented by a small third sibling, the Masker. This lightweight neural network generates a mask to determine what the actor and critic will receive, such that they can focus on learning the task. The masks are created dynamically, depending on the current input. We run experiments on the DeepMind Control Generalization Benchmark, the Distracting Control Suite, and a real UR5 Robotic Arm. Our algorithm improves the agent's focus with useful masks, while its efficient Masker network only adds 0.2% more parameters to the original structure, in contrast to previous work. MaDi consistently achieves generalization results better than or competitive to state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".