MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124319247 · doi:10.21015/vtcs.v13i2.2266

A Next Generation Real Time Frame work for Drone Video Decoding Leveraging IoT-Enabled Communication Network

2025· article· W7124319247 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Ibrar-Ul Haque, Maria Fatima, Faiza Waqas, Mohu-ud-din Bukhari, Manzar Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueVAWKUM Transactions on Computer Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsLow latency (capital markets)JitterLatency (audio)Network packetCommunications systemPacket lossTask (project management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The new data processing systems required reliable. Fast and low latency data services for smart cities operations and unmanned vehicle systems for quick and fast decisions. At present the low latency and speed data for video decoding for real time are required for intelligent decisions. In this research work we present video decoding model based on for decoding data in real time. This proposed model is based on hybrid Edge-Fog-Cloud orchestration layer that perform decoding task in real time according to the network congestion and this technique ensure data integrity, traceable task distribution and protect the data from tempering by using IoT backbone secured by blockchain technology. To reduce the risk of end-to-end latency and packet loss in worst conditions a novel Temporal-Spatial Predictive Decoding (TSPD) method is used. The AI model deep reinforcement learning is used for fast decisions. After analyzing it can be concluded that a 47.8% improvement in decoding throughput, a 62% reduction in jitter and 38% improvement QoE. This shows satisfactory performance from proposed model. By optimizing energy-latency and combining decentralized system with IoT-driven communication for autonomous aerial system can be used in future 6G network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVAWKUM Transactions on Computer SciencesSame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207