MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124359122

Interpretation of 2020 edition of best clinical practice guidelines "Oral health:supporting adults who require assistance" by Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario

2022· article· zh· W7124359122 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
RAN Qian, Xili Zhao, DAI Xuli, TIAN Jiao

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2022
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBest practiceGuidelineClinical PracticeAssociation (psychology)Interpretation (philosophy)Quality (philosophy)Health care
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article interpreted "Oral health: supporting adults who require assistance" issued by the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario in 2020 from three aspects:guideline overview,guideline implementation steps,and guideline recommendations.It aimed to help medical staff,patients,and caregivers to understand the new progress of oral health and nursing,and promote the clinical application of the guidelines in the prevention and care of oral diseases,so as to improve the quality of clinical nursing practice and promote the overall health of patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.149
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.149
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.562
GPT teacher head0.689
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207