MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7124366460

Latent profile analysis of sleep characteristics of patients with mild cognitive impairment and influencing factors

2025· article· zh· W7124366460 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meng Tian, Song Yulei, ZHANG Xueqing, CHEN Yuqing, XU Guihua, BAI Yamei

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLogistic regressionSleep (system call)ActigraphyCognitionSleep disorderDementiaObservational studySleep onset latencyNap
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ObjectiveTo identify potential sleep typing in MCI patients and to explore the characteristics and influencing factors of different sleep typing.MethodsFrom March to December in 2023,community⁃based MCI older adults in Nanjing,Jiangsu Province,China,were enrolled in the study using convenience sampling method.Neuropsychological tests were conducted using the General Information Questionnaire,Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale(MoCA),Brief Mental State Exercise(MMSE),Ability to Perform Daily Living(ADL),and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale(CDR),and their sleep conditions were assessed and monitored using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI) and ActiGraphy.Potential sleep subtypes of MCI patients were identified by latent profile analysis based on objective sleep characteristics monitored by the somatic ActiGraphy as observational variables.Univariate analysis and unordered multicategorical Logistic regression analysis were used to explore the characteristics and influencing factors of different sleep typologies.ResultsA total of 217 MCI patients were recruited in this study,and the results of the potential profiling analysis showed that the sleep of MCI patients could be categorized into four potential categories:sleep deprivation⁃ineffective(31.3%),good sleep(30.0%),sleep fragmentation(27.6%) and difficulty falling asleep(11.1%).Significant differences were found in gender,family history of dementia,smoking,re⁃employment after retirement,social activities,physical activity,hypertension,and FRAIL and MoCA scores among MCI patients with different sleep typologies(P<0.05).The results of unordered multicategorical Logistic regression analysis,The results of multicategorical Logistic regression analysis showed that gender,smoking,re⁃employment after retirement,frailty status,and cognitive function were the influencing factors of sleep typing in MCI patients.ConclusionMCI patients' sleep is characterized by significant group heterogeneity.Healthcare professionals should conduct a comprehensive sleep assessment of MCI patients,identify their sleep typing,and adopt targeted sleep management and intervention strategies for different sleep typing in order to improve the sleep status of MCI patients and delay the progression of cognitive decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicSleep and related disorders→French-language works237,207→