MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124373453

Interpretation of recommendation of two guidelines related to pressure injury

2020· article· zh· W7124373453 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
ZHANG Runjie, GUO Tong, Liu XinJu, TANG Yunyue, YUE Shujin

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2020
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPressure injuryInterpretation (philosophy)Clinical PracticeMEDLINEOrder (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article comparatively analyzed the Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries:Clinical Practice Guideline issued by the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel(NPIAP),European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel(EPUAP),and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance(PPPIA) in 2019 and the Assessment and Management of Pressure Injuries for the Interprofessional Team(Third Edition)issued by Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario(RNAO)in 2016,in order to provide the references for the standardized management of pressure injuries in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.070
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.466
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0700.466
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0140.008
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0110.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.391
GPT teacher head0.651
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicPressure Ulcer Prevention and ManagementFrench-language works237,207