Practice research on pentatonic scale therapy for mild cognitive impairment elderly in nursing on different physical constitution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective：To explore the influence of pentatonic scale therapy on elderly people with mild cognitive impairment of different physical conditions.Methods:The study subjects were randomly divided into observation group(31 cases) and control group(29 cases).The patients in observation group adopted pentatonic scale therapy for the different physical constitution based traditional nursing care and treatment of the nursing institution.The patients in control group were treated with routine care and treatment.Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA)and The Geriatric Depression Scale(GDS)were used before and after the intervention to evaluate the two groups.Results：After the intervention,the results showed improvement in somatic selfcare ability,depression,cognitive ability,and other aspects in different degree in two groups(P<0.05).Some of the dimensions reduced on the followup interview 2 weeks after intervention,the intervention effect was statistically significant different (P<0.05).Conclusions：Pentatonic scale therapy on different physical constitution could improve efficiency on physical selfmaintenance,depression,and cognitive ability of the elderly with mild cognitive impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".