MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7124390089

Interpretation on 'dementia' of 'clinical best practice guidelines:delirium, dementia,and depression in older adults: assessment and care' compiled by Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario,Canada

2020· article· zh· W7124390089 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
He Huaying, KONG Chan, XU Jiaqi, He Mei, XIONG Tian, CHEN Yumeng, Yu Liu, WANG Hui

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2020
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaBest practiceDepression (economics)Association (psychology)Interpretation (philosophy)Nursing practiceClinical PracticeMedical practice
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper interpreted the management of middle⁃aged and older dementia patients in the 2016 edition of 'clinical best practice guidelines:delirium,dementia,and depression in older adults:assessment and care' compiled by Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario,Canada.And this paper was aimed at providing scientific evidence on standardized management of dementia for Chinese medical nursing workers,so as to improve care outcome of older dementia patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.040
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.164
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0400.164
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0130.019
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.553
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders→French-language works237,207→