MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124451440 · doi:10.5951/mt.95.7.0532

Interactive Writing in Mathematics Class: Getting Started

2002· article· W7124451440 on OpenAlexaff
Ralph Mason, P. Janelle McFeetors

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics Teacher Learning and Teaching PK-12 · 2002
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Canadian institutionsRed River CollegeUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeaching methodElementary mathematicsConnected MathematicsMathematical logic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many teachers are recognizing the advantages that student writing may provide in an academic mathematics environment—developing students' understanding of ideas (Pugalee 1997), enabling teachers to identify incomplete conceptions (Chapman 1996), and contributing to a more interactive relationship between students and teacher (Dougherty 1996). However, writing to learn mathematics is not something that most teachers experienced when they were students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics Teacher Learning and Teaching PK-12Same topicMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesFrench-language works237,207