MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7124454447 · doi:10.14288/1.0451237

Dissolved and Particulate PBDE Concentrations in the Strait of Georgia, Juan de Fuca Strait, Burrard Inlet and the Fraser River (2013-2018)

2021· dataset· en· W7124454447 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuanji Sun, Roger Francois, Maria Maldonado

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticulatesSeawaterCongenerInletHydrology (agriculture)Detection limitWater massDeposition (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fifty-five filtered seawater and twenty-one suspended particles samples were collected in the Strait of Georgia and surrounding areas on multiple research cruises between 2013 and 2018. The samples were processed within 48 hrs after collection and sent to SGS AXYS Analytical Services Ltd. (Sidney, B.C., Canada) to measure PBDEs. The dataset includes the dissolved and particulate concentration (pg/kg and pg/L, respectively) of 40 PBDE congeners in each sample, the weight of water (kg) from which dissolved PBDEs were extracted or the volume of water (L) filtered to collect the suspended particles, and mass of congeners in the analytical and procedural blanks. The limits of detection and quantification were determined from the standard deviations of the analytical blanks (3 and 10 standard deviations, respectively). The reported congener concentrations have been blank-corrected. The mass of congeners found to be below their limit of detection or quantification are reported as ranges (0 - LoD, or LoD - LoQ, respectively).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Collections→French-language works237,207→