MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7124552156 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/pwkmn

The structure and implementation of school-based nursing programs for children with special health care needs (CSHCN): A scoping review protocol

2025· other· W7124552156 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2025
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtocol (science)Health carePsychological interventionNursing Interventions ClassificationNursing researchNursing care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this proposed scoping review is to identify how school-based nursing programs that support children with special healthcare needs (CSHCN) are structured and implemented. To date, there is minimal research that synthesizes the development and implementation of school-based nursing programs and interventions, particularly in Canada. To implement effective interventions in Canadian schools for children with medical needs, a better understanding of the structure, organization, and implementation of school-based nursing programs globally is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.170
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.125
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1700.125
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.011
Bibliometrics0.0200.016
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0070.008
Research integrity0.0090.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)→French-language works237,207→