MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7124672212

Impacts immédiats et saisonniers de tempêtes estivales sur l'océan et la glace de mer en Arctique

2025· dissertation· en· W7124672212 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emma Bent

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArctic ice packSea iceStormCryosphereArcticDrift iceAntarctic sea ice
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Arctic, storms play a critical role in affecting sea ice and ocean dynamics by enhancing air-sea interactions, mixing, and ice deformation. However, their longerterm seasonal impacts, particularly in summer when sea ice is reduced, remain unclear.This thesis explores the seasonal influence of summer storms in the Canadian Basin using two coupled ice-ocean models. First, a onedimensional model (NEMO-SI3) is used to assess the effects of idealized storms, revealing that anomalies in mixed layer depth and heat content can persist for weeks, delaying autumn sea ice formation and accelerating winter sea ice growth. Then, a three-dimensional model (NEMO-LIM3) is used to show that while one-dimensional processes dominate in the initial weeks after a synthetic Arctic cyclone occurs, advective processes gradually attenuate these anomalies over time. Thus, delay in the freeze up date may be observed due to a cyclone, but long-term impacts in sea ice thickness are less pronounced. These findings highlight the complex interplay between storms and ice-ocean systems, with implications for seasonal ice forecasting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→