MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124694459 · doi:10.15211/analytics32320252026

French Defense Strategy in the Arctic and the Evolution of NATO's Military Presence in the Region

2025· article· W7124694459 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sergey Grinyaev

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical papers of the Institute of Europe RAS · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArctic Institute of North America
KeywordsMilitarizationThe arcticArcticCompetition (biology)Military technology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article analyzes the situation in the Arctic region against the background of growing competition of leading world powers and strengthening of NATO military presence. Special attention is paid to the new French defense strategy in the Arctic, approved in July 2025, and France's revitalization in the region, including plans to deploy armed forces, develop cooperation with NATO Arctic countries, and invest in specialized technologies to operate in extreme conditions. The study identifies main trends in militarization of the Arctic, peculiarities of the French approach to security, and potential challenges to the interests of Russia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.011
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical papers of the Institute of Europe RASSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207