MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124751696 · doi:10.4000/15iqb

Aux sources de Cythère, la base de données Eros

2010· article· W7124751696 on OpenAlexaff
Geneviève Aitken

Bibliographic record

VenueSpotlight · 2010
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Base (topology)Index (typography)Beach morphodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce programme de travail sur « Watteau et la fête galante » a permis de collecter et d’enregistrer les nouvelles données dans la base documentaire Eros. Élaborée comme un outil de recherche, la base Eros est autant un outil de travail que la mémoire pérenne des études et des restaurations effectuées sur les œuvres. Les technologies avancées de l’information, tant pour la visualisation des images que les index et le moteur de recherche associées aux riches contenus numériques placent cette base au premier plan pour la recherche d’informations en conservation et restauration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.091
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.091
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0180.030
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpotlightSame topicDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningFrench-language works237,207