Une crise sanitaire, de multiples réalités : regards croisés d’acteurs scolaires lors de la pandémie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La COVID-19 a entraîné des perturbations considérables au sein des centres de services scolaires (CSS) du Québec et de leurs différents établissements d’enseignement. Plusieurs décisions importantes ont été prises par les gestionnaires en accord avec l’Institut de la santé publique du Québec afin qu’ils puissent poursuivre leur mission éducative. Cependant, comme il s’agit d’un sujet complexe, il nécessite un regard pluriel afin de mieux comprendre ses répercussions selon une approche multi-informateurs. Cette étude empirique examine les répercussions de la pandémie selon deux temps de mesure [printemps/automne 2021] auprès de différents acteurs d’un CSS : 1) les élèves [primaire, secondaire, formation professionnelle, formation générale des adultes]; 2) les parents d’élèves; 3) le personnel [enseignant, professionnel, de soutien, de direction]. Les résultats présentent des nuances importantes selon leur perception de cinq volets et selon la mesure de leur stress perçu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".