MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

High-Sensitivity Microwave Sensor for Continuous Monitoring of Water-borne Suspended Solids

2025· article· W7124865675 on OpenAlexaff
Mehri Ziaee Bideskan, Nima Karbaschi, Zahra Abbasi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowaveContinuous monitoringDielectricSuspended solidsSuspension (topology)Continuous waveSensitivity (control systems)Particle (ecology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work introduces a highly sensitive microwave sensor system for real-time monitoring of suspended particle concentrations in water streams. The system employs a resonator-based tag positioned near the water sample and a coplanar waveguide (CPW) reader for wireless interrogation. When particles are suspended in water, they alter the dielectric properties, modifying the tag's resonant frequency through electromagnetic interactions. The CPW reader wirelessly captures these frequency shifts. The non-contact approach eliminates contamination risks while enabling continuous monitoring without interrupting water flow. Kaolin (KL) particles were examined as a representative suspended material in irrigation water. Experimental results demonstrate a total frequency shift of 1.7 MHz across 0 to 50 gIL concentration range, corresponding to 34 kHz per g/L sensitivity. This substantial shift is achieved despite only 1.74 % variation in real permittivity, highlighting the sensor's high sensitivity to subtle dielectric variations. Initial studies on deposition time rates were also conducted on three selected concentrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207