MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Characterization of ionospheric scintillation variations in the polar region

2025· article· W7124884708 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhuojun Han, Ruimin Jin, Longjiang Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScintillationInterplanetary scintillationIonospherePolarSpace weatherGNSS applicationsAmplitudeLatitude

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ionospheric scintillation is a rapid change in the amplitude and phase of GNSS signals triggered by ionospheric irregularities, and it is an important indicator reflecting space weather effects and the intensity of ionospheric disturbances. An in-depth understanding of its spatial and temporal evolution characteristics is of great significance for improving the reliability of GNSS positioning as well as spatial disturbance forecasting. This paper systematically analyzes the evolution characteristics of scintillation under different solar activity intensities based on multi-year observation data from four stations of the CHAIN network in the Canadian polar region. The results show that: (1) scintillation is mainly concentrated in the evening to midnight, with a rapid decay before dawn; (2) the activity is significant during the winter and the spring/autumn equinoxes, driven by particle settling and magnetotail reconnection; (3) the scintillation probability gradually decreases from high latitude to low latitude, presenting a clear transition structure; (4) the scintillation intensity shows a significant positive correlation with the solar activity in terms of the inter-annual variations, with the most active years of the Sun (e.g., 2024) showing more frequent and strong perturbations. more frequent and strong perturbation phenomena. The results contribute to a deeper understanding of the dynamics of the irregular structure of the polar ionosphere and its driving mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→