MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Edumorph: A Quiz-Driven Adaptive Learning System Using Dynamic Learner Classification

2025· article· W7124927575 on OpenAlexaff
C Lavanya, Bincy Mary P, Bhumika Murthy, Mradula, Utkarsh Bhardwaj, Vikrant Singh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive learningDashboardPersonalized learningLimitingFeature (linguistics)Adaptive system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adaptive learning systems are increasingly used to personalize education, yet many depend on periodic assessments or teacher input, limiting real-time adaptability. This paper proposes EduMorph, a quiz-driven adaptive learning system that generates personalized roadmaps based solely on quiz performance. Using K-Means clustering, EduMorph dynamically classifies students into smart, average, or slow learner categories by analyzing quiz-based feature vectors. Based on this, the system assigns content of appropriate difficulty and evaluates understanding through a feedback loop. If mastery is not achieved, content is simplified and re-tested. While the system functions autonomously in content assignment, educators have access to a monitoring dashboard to view learner progress and classification. Prototype testing suggests EduMorph enhances engagement and offers a scalable, intelligent e-learning solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningFrench-language works237,207