Perencanaan Akses Transportasi dan Fasilitas Pendukung Kawasan Wisata Air Terjun Taeno, Desa Rumah Tiga, Kota Ambon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This Community Service (PkM) activity is carried out as a tangible contribution of the academic community in supporting the development of local tourism potential in Ambon City, particularly in the Taeno Waterfall area located in Rumah Tiga Village. This area has a high natural attraction but still faces limitations in terms of accessibility and the availability of supporting facilities. The implementation of this activity aims to formulate a development plan for adequate transportation access and supporting facilities that align with the characteristics of the area, in order to enhance the competitiveness of the tourism destination as well as to empower the local community in tourism-based economic activities. The implementation methods include field surveys, observation of existing infrastructure conditions, interviews with local stakeholders (village government, community leaders, and micro-business actors), and planning studies based on the needs and potential of the area. The outcomes of this activity consist of a technical planning document for road access to the waterfall site, as well as the design of supporting tourism facilities (parking area, information boards, public toilets, and resting shelters). This PkM activity provides dual benefits, namely as a tangible support for sustainable tourism development in Ambon City, and as a means of enhancing the capacity of the community to independently manage local potential. The planning results are expected to serve as a basis for local government and development partners in realizing the development of the Taeno Waterfall area as one of the leading ecotourism-based destinations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".