Les usages braconniers de la romance érotique : négocier des féminités désirantes et respectables par la lecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Issu d’entretiens avec des consommatrices de new romance, cet article explore comment celles-ci contournent, transgressent ou reconduisent les scripts de l’hétérosexualité hégémonique. Ces lectrices, à l’intersection d’enjeux spécifiques de genre et de classe sociale, revendiquent ces lectures comme des moments érotiques à soi, qu’elles justifient moralement par opposition à la pornographie. Ces romances viennent alors légitimer de nouveaux horizons (hétéro)sexuels par l’incorporation partielle de pratiques subalternes. Elles permettent ainsi aux lectrices de négocier des féminités désirantes sans contrevenir à l’impératif de respectabilité auquel elles sont tenues. Les politiques de respectabilité dans lesquelles elles s’engagent concourent alors à une recomposition située de l’hétéronormativité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".