Les usages braconniers de la romance érotique : négocier des féminités désirantes et respectables par la lecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Issu d’entretiens avec des consommatrices de new romance, cet article explore comment celles-ci contournent, transgressent ou reconduisent les scripts de l’hétérosexualité hégémonique. Ces lectrices, à l’intersection d’enjeux spécifiques de genre et de classe sociale, revendiquent ces lectures comme des moments érotiques à soi, qu’elles justifient moralement par opposition à la pornographie. Ces romances viennent alors légitimer de nouveaux horizons (hétéro)sexuels par l’incorporation partielle de pratiques subalternes. Elles permettent ainsi aux lectrices de négocier des féminités désirantes sans contrevenir à l’impératif de respectabilité auquel elles sont tenues. Les politiques de respectabilité dans lesquelles elles s’engagent concourent alors à une recomposition située de l’hétéronormativité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".