MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Multifaceted Approach Based on Deep Learning Architectures for Dysarthric Speech Recognition

2025· article· W7124979327 on OpenAlexaff
Belabbas Soumeya, Addou Djamel, Selouani Sid Ahmed

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicVoice and Speech Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCepstrumConnectionismDeep learningSpeech enhancementMel-frequency cepstrumConvolutional neural networkFeature extractionSpeech processingArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dysarthric speech presents significant challenges to effective communication and overall quality of life. Traditional diagnostic methods are often subjective and time-consuming, limiting both the accuracy and efficiency of detecting this condition. In response, this study proposes a novel automated system for dysarthric speech recognition, designed to improve diagnostic precision and timeliness. The proposed system adopts a comprehensive framework that integrates advanced signal processing techniques, robust feature extraction methods, and cutting-edge deep learning architectures. Multiple acoustic features, including Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients “MFCCs” and Power-Normalized Cepstral Coefficients “PNCCs”, are extracted to capture detailed characteristics of the speech signal. Additionally, speech enhancement algorithms such as Minimum Mean Square Error “MMSE” based noise reduction are applied to improve input quality, especially under noisy conditions. At the core of the system lies a deep learning model combining Convolutional Neural Networks “CNNs” with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory “BiLSTM” networks. This architecture effectively captures both local and temporal dependencies within speech signals. To further enhance performance, the Connectionist Temporal Classification “CTC” approach is incorporated for word level recognition in dysarthric speech. CTC is particularly beneficial in speech recognition tasks as it enables training sequence to sequence models without requiring strict alignment between input features and output labels. The system's performance has been thoroughly evaluated on the UASpeech dataset, showing notable effectiveness in handling speech with low intelligibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVoice and Speech DisordersFrench-language works237,207