MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125093820

Development of a membrane process for the concentration of fava bean extract for plant-based dairy applications

2024· article· en· W7125093820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Sjölin, G. Rudolph-Schöpping, Marjesse Smienk, Frank Lipnizki

Bibliographic record

VenueLund University Publications (Lund University) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltrafiltration (renal)MembraneIngredientDairy industryMembrane technologyMixing (physics)Food products
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Fava beans are an increasingly popular and viable crop, and an excellent nutritious choice for novel plant-based food products. Fava beans are industrially underexploited as a food ingredient and are today mainly used as animal feed [1]. However, fava beans are an interesting base material for producing plant-based milk. While soy milk dominates the legume-based beverage segment, there is an opportunity to diversify and broaden this market by incorporating fava beans that offer better functionality and nutrition than soy beans [2, 3]. There are very few studies reported in the scientific literature regarding membranes in the plant-based dairy industry, which opens the possibility of a whole new research field. Common processing steps for plant-based beverages (such as high-shear mixing and ultrahigh temperature treatment) can create shear and thermal effects, which can lead to changes in the structure of the proteins, and subsequently affect the stability of the protein emulsions [4]. Ultrafiltration is well establishedfor the cow milk based dairy industries, but also has great potential in producing legume-based products. Thus, ultrafiltration was investigated as a suitable solution for plant-based dairies.Experimental/methodology. A series of different experiments were performed to study the performance of membranes. Initially, a membrane screening of 5 commercial ultrafiltration membranes with low molecular weight cut-offs from Alfa Laval, Microdyn Nadir and Synder were assessed in an Alfa Laval LabStak M20 unit. The membrane screening was performed in concentration mode at a temperature of50°C, a transmembrane pressure of 2 bar, and at a volume flow of 4 L/min. After this, a parameter study and fouling and cleaning assessment of the two most promising membranes was conducted in an Alfa Laval LabStak M10 membrane unit. To identify the optimal operation parameters, at 50°C, the transmembrane pressure was varied between 0.1 and 2.5 bar, the crossflow velocity was changed between 0.1 and 1.0 m/s. Thereafter, the fouling degree and cleaning capacity were determined throughpure water flux measurements, where both alkaline, enzymatic and acid cleaning agents were assessed. Finally, a pilot scale experiment with the most promising membrane candidate was performed in an Alfa Laval M39 Combi unit (3.8” spiral wound), first as parameter study and then as a concentration study. The transmembrane pressure was varied between 0.5-2.5 bar and the flow changed between 0.6-1.2 m3/h. Results and discussion. From the membrane screening, GR90 (Alfa Laval) and UH005 (Microdyn Nadir) were selected as promising candidates. Both achieved good fluxes (14.8 and 12.8 Lm-2h-1, respectively) combined with high protein retentions (79% and 80% total nitrogen retention, respectively). The parameter study showed that a crossflow velocity of 1 m/s and a transmembrane pressure around 1 bar were optimal operational set-points. Although severe fouling occurred on the membrane surfaces, it was possible to recover the pure water flux through a cleaning protocol combining alkaline and enzymatic cleaning agents. When scaling up the process to a 3.8” spiral wound module of the GR90 membrane, a cross flow of 1.2 m3/h and 0.7 bar was applied to concentrate the fava bean base with a volumetric concentration factor of 3.0. The flux varied between 1-6 Lm-2h-1 during the concentration. Overall, this study showed the possibility of ultrafiltration as a suitable unit operation in the future plant-based dairy industries. Acknowledgments.The Green Dairy AB, Sweden, are greatly acknowledged for the collaboration and supply of the fava bean base.References. [1] Crépon, K.; Marget, P.; Peyronnet, C.; Carrouée, B.; Arese, P.; Duc, G. Field Crops Research, 2010, 115 (3), 329-339.[2] Nawaz, M. A.; Singh, T. K.; Stockmann, R.; Jegasothy, H.; Buckow, R. Foods, 2021, 10 (6).[3] Nawaz, M. A.; Tan, M.; Øiseth, S.; Buckow, R. Food Reviews International, 2022, 38 (5), 1064-1102.[4] Qamar, S.; Bhandari, B.; Prakash, S. Food Research International 2019, 116, 1374-1385.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLund University Publications (Lund University)Same topicMembrane Separation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207