MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125150352 · doi:10.21178/2079-6080.2025.3.65

Morphological characteristics of lodgepole pine and Scots pine needles in experimental plantations of the Komi Republic

2025· article· W7125150352 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S.N. Plyusnina, T.A. Pristova, R.G. Gulyaev

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Saint Petersburg Forestry Research Institute · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSeedling growth and survival studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScots pinePinus contortaWoody plantPinus <genus>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies were carried out in five 20-year experimental plantations of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) on the territory of the Komi Republic.The plantations were planted as 1-2-year-old seedlings with a closed root system in 2004-2007 in forest cultivation areas of various origins: quarries, agricultural lands, pine and spruce clearings.The source material was six forest seed plantations established on a geographical basis in Sweden, using seed progeny of plus trees selected in Canada.Locally-origin Scots pine seedlings were used for control.The following parameters of the needles were assessed: lifespan, dry weight, length, width, thickness, surface area, surface density, dry matter content.It was revealed that, depending on forest conditions, the life expectancy of needles in experimental cultures in the middle taiga subzone of the Komi Republic is 4-6 years for lodgepole pine, and 3-4 years for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.).It is shown that, regardless of the origin of the forest-culture area, the needles of lodgepole pine on average statistically significantly (p < 0.001) surpassed the locally occurring Scots pine in absolute dry weight, length and surface area by 1.4 times.Interspecific differences in such indices as width and thickness of needles have no definite directionality.Dry matter content in needles of both species has no statistically significant differences.Age-related changes in needle mass were established.A positive correlation between the needle mass and the content of dry matter in it was shown.A number of determined indicators are influenced by forest conditions, and they are more pronounced in the Scotch pine than in the lodgepole pine. (-), (,-.0.00-23,0(,350.0 2(2(( 3,0.00( : 3, 2025

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Saint Petersburg Forestry Research InstituteSame topicSeedling growth and survival studiesFrench-language works237,207