MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125205179 · doi:10.1080/21619441.2025.2598502

Situating Hābasāna: Charting the Affective Boundaries of the Sidi Kingdom in Konkan

2025· article· en· W7125205179 on OpenAlexaff
Durga Kale

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJapanese History and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKingdomNarrativeGovernment (linguistics)Agency (philosophy)Perspective (graphical)Subject (documents)Field (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The legacy of Africans in India continues to be presented as a checkered past with the backdrop of the slave trade for the seventeenth century rise of Afro-Indians, or communities known by the labels Sidi or Habashi, in the then political scene. Behind the veil of the political and economic movements of the period, lie the embedded histories of translocation. This article explores the cases from the seventeenth to the nineteenth centuries in Konkan, along the west coast of India to open the conversation on the unique socio-cultural nexus burgeoned by the local Sidi rule. The discussion presents the Sidi rulers in Konkan bringing together the religious, political, and social currents from their original African homes and localizing some along the Konkani littoral. With a brief review of extant historic data on the Sidis, archival material such as personal correspondence, and fragments of material culture in Konkan, this article seeks to chart the trajectory of destabilised Sidi presence. Amidst the waves of relocation, an idea of “Hābasāna” takes root under the auspices of the Sidi Nawabs of Janjira, where the discussion will reflect moments of memorialisation and affective histories of landscape through the lens of the displaced Sidi families in modern times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of African Diaspora Archaeology and HeritageSame topicJapanese History and CultureFrench-language works237,207