Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les coups de chaleur représentent une urgence médicale de plus en plus fréquente en raison des changements climatiques et de l’engouement pour les sports d’endurance. Dans cet article, il est question du coup de chaleur lié à l’exercice. Plus précisément, les principaux facteurs de risque, les mécanismes de thermorégulation et les effets du coup de chaleur sur le corps. La reconnaissance rapide de cette condition et les interventions à mettre en place, tant en contexte préhospitalier qu’à l’urgence, seront précisés. Des recommandations concrètes sont également proposées afin de soutenir les équipes cliniques dans la prise en charge. En diffusant ces connaissances et en adaptant certaines pratiques, les équipes d’urgence peuvent améliorer le pronostic des personnes atteintes. Il est encouragé de discuter de ces approches au sein des milieux cliniques afin de favoriser une intervention efficace face à un coup de chaleur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".