Interconnected Internet of Things Driven Machine Learning Framework for Quality Monitoring in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quality by Design (QbD) presents ongoing challenges for the pharmaceutical industry in maintaining consistent product quality, particularly when it comes to monitoring Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) in networked IoT systems.To address these issues, this study proposes a hybrid machine learning framework named the Dynamic Learning Data-Processing and Statistical-Driven Regression Model (DLDPSDbRM), which combines data collection through the IoT with predictive analytics based on regression for real-time quality monitoring.The proposed model's adaptive data learning mechanism is what makes it unique; it constantly adjusts regression parameters to capture process data's non-linear changes and identify when quality benchmarks aren't being reached.In comparison to conventional regression and static learning models, the DLDPSDbRM improves prediction accuracy by 25% and reduces Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) by 30% when tested on pharmaceutical production datasets.The results verify the model's capacity to improve process dependability, optimize decisions about quality control, and guarantee adherence to regulatory requirements like ICH Q8 (R2).Smarter, more transparent, and regulation-aligned pharmaceutical manufacturing is made possible by the proposed architecture, which offers a scalable approach for datadriven quality assurance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".