Using an Experimental Approach to Study the Effect of Different Nanomaterials on Thermal, Mechanical, and Optical Properties of Epoxy Coating
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Epoxy coatings face performance limitations under harsh environmental conditions, including poor UV resistance and discoloration over time, necessitating the enhancement of their properties through additives and modifications.This study aims to develop a high-performance epoxy coating by improving its structure through the addition of carefully selected nanomaterials.It investigates the contribution of these materials to improving mechanical strength, enhancing operational stability, and increasing optical stability, thereby improving coating quality and suitability for diverse application conditions.In this work, nanoparticles were prepared and incorporated into a polymer matrix, specifically an epoxy matrix, using ultrasonic stimulation combined with solution mixing techniques to achieve high homogeneity and efficient particle dispersion within the material.The results, as observed in the DSc test, showed an increase in the glass transition temperature (Tg) at specific concentrations of some of the materials used.Furthermore, the adhesion strength was significantly enhanced by the addition of the nanomaterials.MMT exhibits superior performance compared to zinc oxide (ZnO) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) due to its layered structure, which enhances its interaction with the epoxy matrix.It achieved the highest bond strength improvement at a 2% concentration, reaching 3.27 MPa.Furthermore, in UV tests, UV absorbance increased with the presence of various nanoparticles (zinc oxide, MMT, and titanium dioxide), but the highest absorbance was observed with 2% titanium dioxide, reaching 0.5% at 350 nm.This makes it the most protective additive for coatings.Transmittance decreased with increasing filler concentration, indicating improved radiation shielding performance.In impact strength tests, a 71% improvement was observed with 1% zinc oxide.These impact tests demonstrate a significant improvement in impact strength with nanoparticles compared to pure epoxy, confirming the effectiveness of these materials in enhancing the overall performance of coatings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".