MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125250017 · doi:10.18280/mmep.121222

Underwater Image Enhancement Through Smooth Gridded Adaptive Color Compensation with Green-Tint Removal and Integrated CLAHE

2025· article· W7125250017 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M Manasa, Praveen Kulkarni

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderwaterAdaptive histogram equalizationCompensation (psychology)Image enhancementNoise (video)Color image

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Underwater images frequently have low contrast, color distortion, and a greenish hue, due to wavelength-dependent light absorption and scattering.These issues limit the efficacy of underwater imaging applications and negatively impact visual perception.This paper presents a unique enhancement framework called Smooth Gridded Adaptive Color Compensation (SGACC) with Green Tint Removal (GTR) and adaptive Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) to address these issues.While GTR adjusts for red-channel attenuation to lessen green dominance, the SGACC module uses Gaussian-blended grids for smooth and targeted color correction.By adapting to changes in brightness while maintaining image features, adaptive CLAHE significantly improves local contrast.The proposed method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art techniques, according to experimental assessments on Large-Scale Underwater Image (LSUI) and Underwater Image Enhancement Benchmark (UIEB) datasets.It offers significant Underwater Image Quality Measure (UIQM) / Underwater Color Image Quality Evaluation (UCIQE) improvements, 2.0% Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) gain, and up to 3.6 dB better Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) on LSUI.It achieves 21.11 dB PSNR and 0.9631 SSIM on UIEB, indicating exceptional perceptual quality.The proposed technique, SGACC-GTR, with adaptive CLAHE architecture, successfully restores natural color balance and enhances underwater image quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicImage Enhancement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207