Ragazzi che non possono crescere. Appunti su Peter Pan come Bildungsroman
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1900, three children played surrounded by nature at Black Lake Cottage in Farnham, England, amid stories and panic-stricken metamorphoses planned by “Uncle Jim”. That experience gave rise to a bizarre book, The Boy Castaways of Black Lake Island, with photographs and short captions, the first work in which we glimpse the “shadow” of Peter Pan. The following year, James Matthew Barrie “Uncle Jim” published The Little White Bird, an anti-novel in which a six-day-old baby flies out of his bedroom window into Kensington Gardens. Thus began the adventure of one of the most successful characters in world literature, not only for children, with countless theatrical and film adaptations. Despite the subtitle - The Boy Who Wouldn't Grow Up - of the play that brought him resounding public success in 1904, Peter Pan is a powerful coming-of-age novel, with metaphors hidden beneath the images of shadows, islands and mythological ancestry with the god Pan. This contribution aims to investigate Barrie's most famous literary work in the context of the Bildungsroman, demonstrating how Peter Pan fully interprets the meaning of Bildung: growing up both as a rejection and as an inevitable, yet interpretable and questionable, destiny.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".