Pengembangan Kecamatan Tengaran Berkelanjutan dengan Pendekatan Urban Fringe Development dan Sustainable Small Town Planning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tengaran District is administratively part of the Semarang Regency area, but sociomorphologically, spatially and socioeconomically, its development is greatly influenced by the development of Salatiga City to the north and Boyolali Regency to the south. The aim of this research is to provide direction in sustainable urban planning in Tengaran District. Tengaran Urban Planning will be directed towards the sustainable development of small suburban towns. This planning combines 2 main approaches, namely Sustainable Small Town Planning and Urban Fringe Development. The research method used is descriptive qualitative, while the data collection method uses interviews and direct observation in the field. The research results resulted in a morphological division of the Tengaran District development zone into five parts based on regional development characteristics, namely market zone, inner fringe area, intermediate fringe area and outer fringe area, as well as special areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".