Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Re-Education on Proprioceptive Accuracy, Dynamic Knee Stability, and Pain Modulation in Geriatric Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in geriatric populations presents a multifaceted challenge characterized by progressive cartilage degradation, sensorimotor dysfunction, and compromised joint stability. While pain management remains central to rehabilitation, proprioceptive dysfunction and impaired dynamic stability represent significant but understudied mechanisms in older adults with KOA. This randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy of structured neuromuscular re-education (NMR) in addressing proprioceptive accuracy, dynamic knee stability, and pain modulation in geriatric KOA patients. Objectives: To evaluate the differential effects of neuromuscular re-education versus conventional physiotherapy on joint position sense accuracy, dynamic balance performance, functional mobility, and pain perception in adults aged 65 years and above with moderate-to-severe knee osteoarthritis. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled 108 geriatric patients (age ≥65 years) diagnosed with bilateral or unilateral moderate-to-severe KOA (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade II-IV). Participants were randomly assigned to either neuromuscular re-education (NMR group, n=54) or conventional exercise control (CEC group, n=54). The NMR protocol comprised 12 week structured interventions incorporating proprioceptive training, dynamic balance exercises, and selective neuromuscular control with emphasis on mechanoreceptor stimulation. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks, including visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale, joint position sense error quantification, Y-Balance Test for dynamic stability, Timed Up and Go (TUG) for functional mobility, 30-second Chair Stand Test for lower limb strength endurance, and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for postural stability. Statistical analysis employed mixed-model analysis of variance with between-group comparisons evaluated using independent t-tests. Intention-to treat analysis was performed with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Significant between-group differences emerged favoring the NMR intervention across all primary outcome measures. The NMR group demonstrated superior proprioceptive accuracy (mean reduction in joint position sense error: 4.2±1.8 degrees versus 1.5±1.2 degrees; p=0.001), enhanced dynamic balance performance on Y-Balance Test (asymmetry index improvement: 8.3±2.1% versus 3.7±1.9%; p=0.002), and greater functional improvements on TUG test (mean improvement: 2.1±0.9 seconds versus 0.8±0.7 seconds; p=0.003). Pain reduction favored the NMR approach, with WOMAC pain subscale scores declining by 18.5±6.2 points compared to 7.3±5.1 points in the control group (p<0.001). Improvements in Berg Balance Scale scores were significantly greater in the NMR group (mean improvement: 6.8±2.3 points versus 2.4±2.0 points; p<0.001). Notably, proprioceptive gains persisted at the 12-week assessment, suggesting sustained neural adaptation within the geriatric population. The 30-second Chair Stand Test demonstrated progressive strengthening, with the NMR group achieving 4.2±1.6 additional repetitions compared to 1.3±1.1 repetitions in controls (p<0.001). Conclusions: This trial provides robust evidence that structured neuromuscular re-education targeting proprioceptive accuracy and dynamic stability represents a superior intervention strategy compared to conventional exercise for managing geriatric knee osteoarthritis. The substantial improvements in proprioceptive function, dynamic balance, functional mobility, and pain perception support the integration of mechanoreceptor-focused training within standard physiotherapy protocols for older adults with KOA. These findings substantiate OARSI and EULAR recommendations emphasizing multimodal, neuromuscularly-informed rehabilitation approaches. Future investigations should examine long-term efficacy, optimal dosing parameters, and predictive factors for individual responsiveness to neuromuscular interventions in geriatric populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".