André Désilets, Les tensions de l’errance, préface de Jean Renaud, Sainte-Foy (Québec), Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 2001, coll. « Zétêsis », XIV + 82 p.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anne FARGOT-LARGEAULT. — L’émergence de la bioéthique Un regard rétrospectif permet de distinguer quatre phases dans l’émergence de la bioéthique. D’abord (dans les années 1960), une phase d’indignation, qui fait suite à la découverte de conduites scandaleuses dans la recherche biomédicale. Vient ensuite une période d’institutionnalisation, qui voit naître les premières institutions nationales et internationales de régulation. Nous sommes désormais dans une phase de mise en application, où l’on s’efforce de faire passer dans la pratique les règles ainsi dégagées. Cet effort collectif de normalisation n’élimine pas le pluralisme des références éthiques ultimes, mais il témoigne d’un refus du nihilisme et d’un relatif consensus autour d’un certain nombre de grands principes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it