From America to the All-Russian Local Council of 1917-1918 and back: the diaries of Archpriest Leonid Turkevich
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the topic of scientific publication of memoirs of the participants of the All-Russian Local Council of 1917-1918. The publication of the diaries and notebooks of Archpriest Leonid Turkevich, the future Metropolitan of All America and Canada Leontius, the First Hierarch of the North American Metropolis in 1950-1965, the originals of which are kept in the Library of Congress, is considered. The diaries reflect the dramatic period of 1917-1918, when, as rector of St. Nicholas Cathedral in New York City, Archpriest Leonid participated in the work of the 1917-1918 Council as a representative of the North American Diocese-Mission. Archpriest Leonid kept records of the discussions and various messages of the participants of the Council, noted interesting details of behind-the-scenes discussions, and left us his impressions of Russia, which appeared as if in a new light after a long stay abroad. The publishers of these sources are candidate of theology, priest Evgeny Ageyev and candidate of historical sciences A.I. Mramornov.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".