MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125480229 · doi:10.7202/1122276ar

La démonologie de Dom Augustin Calmet (1672–1757)

2025· article· fr· W7125480229 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Snyder

Bibliographic record

VenueReligiologiques · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental crisisEnvironmental policy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le premier tome du Traité sur les apparitions des esprits et sur les vampires ou les revenans de Hongrie, de Moravie, etc. (1751) de Dom Augustin Calmet porte sur la démonologie. Dans ce traité sont approfondis plusieurs éléments de démonologie publiés dans ses analyses et dissertations bibliques. Cet article présente les thèmes les plus importants : le pouvoir des mauvais anges, l’exorcisme, le sabbat des sorcières et la permission de Dieu. Sur chacun de ces thèmes, nous comparons comment Dom Calmet se situe par rapport à ses principales sources démonologiques. Cet érudit des grands traités démonologiques défend l’existence du Diable, tout en réfutant plusieurs croyances présentées dans ces traités. Nous soutenons que, dans ce XVIIIe siècle caractérisé par la perte de l’hégémonie des démonologues, Dom Calmet cherche une voie raisonnable entre la tradition démonologique, la crédulité populaire et la nouvelle critique des Lumières.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReligiologiquesSame topicDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningFrench-language works237,207