MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125482273 · doi:10.1080/07494467.2025.2593085

Converging Trajectories in the Creative Practice of György Kurtág and Luigi Nono

2025· article· en· W7125482273 on OpenAlexaff
Friedemann Sallis

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Music Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArtistic and Creative Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreativityAction (physics)Perspective (graphical)Work (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This text examines the converging trajectories in the creative practice of György Kurtág and Luigi Nono. Despite the enormous differences that mark their music, their backgrounds, and their public personas, important similarities do emerge when we study the development of their compositional technique in more detail. These similarities became more pronounced after their first meeting in 1978 and are particularly strong in that liminal space in which composition and performance overlap. The primary objects of study will be music composed in the 1970s and 1980s, notably Kurtág’s ‘In Memoriam Joannis Pilinszky’ from the Kafka-Fragmente Op. 24 (1985–1987) and Omaggio a György Kurtág (1983–1986) by Nono.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContemporary Music ReviewSame topicArtistic and Creative ResearchFrench-language works237,207