MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7125490209 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaf101

La détection et la prise en charge de l’insuffisance rénale aiguë chez les enfants

2025· article· en· W7125490209 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cal Robinson, Peter Wong, Kristen J Pederson, Kayla Flood, Amrit Kirpalani, Cherry Mammen, E Ulrich

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Paediatric Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationMedical screeningCongenital diseaseIle de france

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'insuffisance rénale aiguë, courante chez les nouveau-nés et les enfants hospitalisés, est associée à des pronostics défavorables à court et à long terme. Il faut la prévenir et la détecter rapidement pour en limiter la progression et éviter les complications. Cependant, au Canada, elle est actuellement sous-dépistée chez les enfants, et les soins de suivi sont très variables. Le présent document de principes de la Société canadienne de pédiatrie vise à analyser l'épidémiologie et les facteurs de risque de l'insuffisance rénale aiguë chez les enfants, les stratégies pour la diagnostiquer et la prendre en charge en cas d'hospitalisation, les risques qu'elle comporte à long terme et les recommandations relatives à la surveillance dans le cadre du suivi de cette pathologie. Un volet distinct porte sur les nuances relatives à la détection et à la prise en charge de l'insuffisance rénale aiguë chez les nouveau-nés en raison des considérations propres à cette population de patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicPediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies→French-language works237,207→