MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125497370 · doi:10.18280/jesa.581213

Real-time Communications Network Modeling for Critical Virtual Power Plant Applications

2025· article· W7125497370 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ahmed I. Alghannam, Firas S. Alsharbaty

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Mosul
KeywordsPower (physics)Telecommunications networkKey (lock)Network modelCommunications systemComponent (thermodynamics)Models of communication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A reliable two-way communication network is vital for the operation of a virtual power plant (VPP).It supports the continuous flow of monitoring and control information between distributed energy resources (DERs) and the VPP control center (VPPCC).The VPP provides a wide range of services through its DERs, and each service requires specific end-to-end (ETE) delay and data reliability.These requirements must be carefully considered when designing the communications network infrastructure.In this work, a communications network based on the IEC 61850 standard is proposed to meet the stringent requirements of time-critical services, such as emergency frequency support and emergency demand response.The performance of the proposed network was validated using a simulation model, with ETE delay and data reliability considered as key evaluation metrics.The simulation results show an ETE delay of 5.17 ms for MMS messages, while the reliability of the received data reaches 99.999%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207