Peasant contracts and church «building» in the Russian North in the 17th - first half of the 18th century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The review is devoted to one of the sections of the book “ ‘Building for the Sake of the Monastery’. Archbishop, Monastery and Church Building in Rus’ in the Late 14th - Early 18th Century: Research, Texts and Maps” (Moscow; St. Petersburg, 2024), which focuses on the economic relations of peasants with the church parish. The section “Churches” (Section IV) contains an article by S. A. Nikonov “Contract, and Contract’ Charters of the Bogoyavlensky Ukhtostrovsky Parish in the 17th - First Quarter of the 18th Century” and an extensive publication of acts of this parish, prepared for publication by S. A. Nikonov with the participation of N. V. Bashnin and N. N. Levchenko. The author of the review emphasizes the problem of classifying these acts by the types of the language formulas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".