MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125541323 · doi:10.3917/etr.0903.0467a

Bertrand Pinçon , Qohélet. Le parti pris de la vie , Paris/Montréal, Cerf/Mediaspaul, coll. « Lire la Bible 169 », 2011. 21,5 cm. 223 p. ISBN 978-2-204-09367-5. € 20

2015· article· fr· W7125541323 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dany Nocquet

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes théologiques et religieuses · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Subject (documents)Perspective (graphical)Meaning (existential)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La pratique de la théologie est une mise à l’épreuve de l’immobilité dont nous rêvons pourtant, par laquelle s’ordonnent souvent nos concepts et nos lieux théologiques. Pascale Renaud-Grosbras* s’attache à montrer que la théologie pratique, et tout particulièrement l’épreuve du ministère pastoral, est un lieu mouvant par excellence. Le mouvement, chance pour la théologie, ne l’est pas par choix délibéré, mais en raison de l’objet même de la théologie pratique : ce qui vient est l’horizon de notre espérance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1320.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes théologiques et religieusesSame topicPhilosophy, Sociology, Political TheoryFrench-language works237,207