MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Framework for Source Code Compliance Analysis

2025· article· W7125587271 on OpenAlexaff
Mete Isiksalan, Kostas Kontogiannis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity and Verification in Computing
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersOrthopaedic Research Foundation
KeywordsXACMLBackupSource codeNISTPipeline (software)Code (set theory)Abstract syntax treeAccess controlParsing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large software systems often involve highly complex logic and are susceptible to various types of violations, including security breaches, access control violations, backup failures, and privacy infringements. In this short paper, we present an architecture along with two illustrative source code analyses: the first traces private information across invocations spanning multiple modules written in different languages, while the second identifies security vulnerabilities related to Crypto Integrity violations as specified in NIST 800-53 SI7(6) specification. The proposed architecture employs a parsing pipeline that generates an in-memory abstract syntax tree (AST) and supports programs written in C, C++, Java, JavaScript, Go, and COBOL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSecurity and Verification in ComputingFrench-language works237,207