Intelligent Surveillance Across Multi-Domain Environments Using Deep Learning Architectures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Today's surveillance systems need to do more than just record; they need to understand, react, and protect in real time in places like homes, schools, city streets, and corporate campuses. This paper talks about a unified deep learning framework that combines a number of smart functions, such as spotting objects and fire hazards, recognizing human actions, spotting drones and intruders, and flagging strange behaviour like falls or suspicious activity. We use models like YOLO, EfficientDet, MobileNetV2, ResNet-101, CNN-LSTM, ConvLSTM2D, LRCN, and I3D to learn about and study behaviour over time and space. The system can respond quickly and effectively, even in crowded or complicated scenes, thanks to attention mechanisms, skeletal tracking through Mediapipe, and edge computing. Testing in the real world shows that the system can recognize human activity with more than 98% accuracy and very few false alarms. In general, this method shows that there is a reliable and scalable way to meet the security needs of smart environments with intelligence and speed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it